The Trump administration. They are now targeting black children in a Tuskegee style experiment. Let me give you the details of this. Put a full mask. CDC, the Trump administration [00:00:15] and RFK Jr's, CDC is seeking to carry out a Tuskegee 2.0 here, but this time on infants from Guinea Bissau exposing them to hepatitis B. [00:00:34] Yeah, this is an actual thing. This is not some, potential, project. This is not a whistleblower. On December 18th, the CDC announced a $1.6 million award. [00:00:54] Without competition. That means nobody had to bid for it. That means the deal was made at some closed door meeting well before the announcement was proclaimed. [00:01:09] That's what this means to two Danish researchers, Peter Abbey and Christine Bell. Ben. That would fund an experiment on babies in Guinea-Bissau. [00:01:26] The grant, the agency said in a federal Register notice, would fund a, quote, randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of neonatal hepatitis B vaccination on early life, mortality, morbidity [00:01:44] and long term developmental outcomes. In, quote, an experiment on baby reminiscent of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study that targeted black men between 1932 and 1972. The goal is to run a randomized, controlled trial that would give a birth [00:02:03] dose of the hepatitis B vaccine to half of the 14,000 newborn participants, but not to the other half. In order to study whether the birth dose had potentially negative health effects, [00:02:19] such as skin ailments or neurodevelopmental disorders. An anonymous CDC official told Inside Medicine that, quote, we are allowing children, infants to be exposed to hepatitis B when we could actually prevent it [00:02:36] and then follow them for five years to see what happens. That's not long enough to see the long term benefits, but might be long enough to find some nonspecific effects. Mind you, these researchers have been scrutinized for shady research practices and their ethics in the past, so a group of top Danish statisticians Completed a withering analysis [00:02:57] of the duo's research, which would be published in the International Journal of Vaccine Next. Weeks later, the analysis document, quote questionable research practices and unspooled at rap sheet of poor scientific practices. [00:03:14] Now, I want to remind everybody put the guy who's in charge. These are these are other researchers, these other people in the field. We call it peer reviewed. Okay. So, research goes through a peer review process of where people who are [00:03:30] in that same scientific class will review the submitted data of their research, will review the submitted data, and they will give you, typically a review or edit requirement. And then you resubmit, and if you resubmit and you have successfully done the review [00:03:48] or edit requirement, you can get published in an academic journal. I've had to go through the same thing. So this isn't a YouTuber discrediting or attempting to discredit research. These are actual peer reviewers who are in the scientific class of study. [00:04:03] So that's context. That's important. Two days after the statistician submitted their report, they already were in confidential discussions. Confidential discussions with Who? RFK Jr's hand-picked HHS officials and their project was deemed [00:04:22] a funding priority, with no explanation as to why the study proposal came. Just as Kennedy was weighing a controversial policy shift that he announced in mid December to no longer universally recommend hepatitis B vaccinations, [00:04:37] including the birth dose, which is widely credited with virtually eliminated transmission of the disease from mothers to infants. Now, I want to remind you, you you have outs in America. You don't have to have it. Religious purposes. ET cetera. ET cetera. All right, so those things still exist. Now, a senior official in the nation [00:04:57] in the host country, said that the trial has been canceled due to what? Ethical concerns? Ethical concerns about what exactly? What they trying to do? [00:05:13] The study design ethical concerns of the study design. According to a letter obtained by the Guardian on Friday, the nation will continue its current vaccination schedule until the birth dose is implemented for all newborns, the letter said. CDC officials were insisting the study will move forward, however, quote, to be [00:05:33] clear, the trial will proceed as planned, even though the nation says, we don't want you doing this, our baby. We don't want you playing with them like this. We want to remain sovereign. And, mothers and fathers will be able to make decisions for their own children. And you stay out of these affairs. [00:05:48] We don't like the design of your study, Which any nation, any individual, should have the right to say, right? You definitely should have the right to say it about your baby. [00:06:05] To be clear, the trial will proceed as planned. That's what the HHS assistant secretary of Public Affairs told them in a statement. Africa CDC, an organization with no affiliation to the US CDC, [00:06:21] shared weeks old communications unrelated to the trial as part of a public relations campaign aimed to shape public perception rather than engaging in the scientific facts, he said. This research represents the world's first and potential only opportunity to rigorously evaluate your overall health effects. [00:06:36] HBO. Damn shame. Now who do you believe? Who's the. Who's the spin master? This is what oppressive policy looks like across the world. We're talking about, some money to experimental children. [00:06:55] As if there's a side against. What the hell are you think? As if there are two, credible sides to debate this issue. All right, we'll keep you updated. Share your thoughts here. This kind of human experimentation selection, if you will, is just unethical. [00:07:13] As you know, doc, it's unethical. And nobody should even be even thinking about something like this. In fact, there's arguments and debates, as there probably should be, whether you should be doing these kind of experiments on animals. That's how passionate people are. I don't even understand why someone would affix their name to this, [00:07:32] except that they can get away with it because they're treating a segment, in this case, babies, as if they're subhuman. A segment of our population that doesn't deserve dignity or health. Yeah. Very sad. We will bring you updates on this story.